I'm not usually one for nighttime entries, but it's quiet here and I just feel like ridding myself of some of the clutter that threatens to overtake the precious space between my ears. Grey matter, as Danny Elfman called it all those years ago. Oh, how I loved him and that band of his. Oingo Boingo were never quite as big on the east coast but we California kids dug them. They played an annual Halloween concert that Michele and I greatly anticipated each year and attended at least half a dozen times. There was truly nothing like it: thousands of people showing up in costume for a macabre parade accompanied by Boingo's matchless sound. Now Elfman's married to Bridget Fonda and scoring movies like Big Fish. I guess we all grow up sometimes, right?
Music is on my mind these days, after spending several hours recently updating my MP3 player so that all album titles and release dates are accurate. (Hey, I never denied being a certifiable music geek.) What I found more difficult was trying to assign a specific genre to certain artists, something the MP3 player insists you do, or does for you (calling Beck "alternative folk"... huh?). Some artists are no-brainers. Stevie Wonder = R&B. Yo La Tengo = Indie. Depeche Mode = New Wave. The Beatles = Classic Rock. The categories may not seem that straightforward to you, but I classified the artists in my player based on where I'd think to look for them, should I choose to search by genre.
Other artists proved more difficult to categorize. For example, His Royal Highness, Prince. Do I put him under Funk? R&B? Pop? And what about bands typically classified as punk that I nevertheless do not consider punk (i.e. The Clash or Police) or the use of the term "goth" (which I hate) to describe any band whose members have dyed their hair black and wear matching lipstick (i.e. The Cure)? How can I allow my MP3 player to categorize Morcheeba as trip-hop when I'm not even exactly certain what the term means? What about bands my MP3, in its infinite wisdom, horribly miscategorizes? For example, refering to Radiohead as Dream Pop or R.E.M. as Folk Rock? Again, the player is programmed to be as specific as possible, but while those genre classifications might be perfectly fine for some, they just didn't sit right with me. Not that I could always do a better job of categorization than my little computerized songster.
So, the categorization process -- employed as a lighthearted means of taking my mind off the bigger issues in my own life and in the world as a whole -- turned into something of a beast, keeping me up until all hours, taunting me to beat it at its little game of genre-defining. Which I'm not sure I did.
My categorization of rock bands from the 60s and 70s (Beatles, Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, Stones, et al) places them under the rather broad umbrella of "Classic Rock," which I consider perfectly appropriate. But then I began thinking of the playlist on our local classic rock station, which -- along with the requisite Beatles, Dead and so forth -- throws in songs by artists like Pearl Jam and Nirvana. On a station calling itself "The Classic Rock Experience?" Most classic rock stations' entire catalogs stretch just far enough to include 1979, but rarely delve into the Decade of Excess, let alone the 90s. I can understand placing current recording artists in the classic rock cluster if they happened to start their careers way back when (i.e. Tom Petty, Peter Gabriel, Aerosmith, etc.). But have I gotten so old that bands first emerging while I was in college are now considered classic rock? Judge for yourself. Here a few songs played regularly on 93.1, Humboldt's Classic Rock Experience:
Red Hot Chili Peppers - "Under the Bridge"
Pearl Jam - "Jeremy"
Nirvana - "Come as You Are"
U2 - "With or Without You"
Soundgarden - "Black Hole Sun"
Stone Temple Pilots - "Plush"
R.E.M. - "Losing My Religion" (now, if you're including R.E.M. in a classic rock lineup, shouldn't you reach further back in their catalog than 1991?)
I suppose the station could be applying the word "classic" to mean "memorable" or "unforgettable," but I always perceived the term "classic rock" as signifying something "enduring" or "ageless," thus pertaining to songs that have been around a hell of a lot longer than "Smells Like Teen Spirit." But I suppose the use of the term for newer artists is apropos, if you consider the actual meaning of the word. It just gets my knickers in a twist, for some reason.
At any rate, for those concerned over whether or not I can successfully manage to keep the disconcerting news of the world in the back of my mind while allowing the minutiae of my own life to dance to the forefront, fear not! It's quite obvious I've achieved just that.
Posted by ayelet at April 13, 2004 09:31 PMThe Beatles are not Classic Rock, they're British Invasion. Stevie Wonder is not R&B, he's Motown. Depeche Mode is not New Wave, they're synthpop tripe from the depths of hell.
Posted by: jon"music geekier than you" mc at April 23, 2004 01:00 PMI'd just like to help you out by saying that the songs you listed were all songs I listened to while in high school (although early high school, but still high school). I can hardlly see how they can be classified as classic rock. I was born in 1980, (sorry but it's true) so if these songs are "classic" then what the hell am I! Ancient, that doesn't float with me, or the rest of you I'm sure. I am on your side, and say the station is stupid. Kind of like our "80's" station that plays stuff from 76-93. Ok now you're just a mix station!
PS What would your MP3 player classify DMB as, we are always wondering what he would be.
Funny (and wrong maybe) but I never consider the Beatles "Classic Rock" - I reserve that genre for Led Zepplin and Pink Floyd. And yet "Oldies" seems wrong for them too, the DooWop crowd has the patent on that one. So let's just say some bands cannot be categorized.
(And I was a BIG Oingo Boingo fan back in college, they had their time here on the EC too)
Posted by: jackie at April 14, 2004 01:37 PMIt's kinda like when 103.1 Indie launched out here (a station that I haven't tuned in to ever since all this FCC hoopla)-- it was only a matter of time before the formats started to include more recent songs. Just remember: when we were kids, our parents were probably going through this very same phenomenon.
As for categorization, my tendency is to lump bands into what they are best known for, stylistically. Therefore, even though The Clash got more dub-influenced over time, they are (for cateogorical purposes) punk. Ministry started off as sunth-pop, but they are best known for Industrial music. Prince rocks out here and there, and jazzes it up a lot, but he is R&B/Urban/Soul... anything but Rap.
Posted by: Sex at April 14, 2004 12:58 PMI have to wholeheartedly agree with you, especially when it comes to what's now considered "oldies" or "classic rock." I was startled to be riding in the car, listening to some station or another, merrily singing along, and then discover that the station was "Classic Rock" and "Oldies"!! I'm too damned young to know all the words to any "oldie" - unless, of course, we're talking someone enduring like The Beatles or Elvis or something. For crying out loud, anything I listened to when I was in high school can't possibly be old - I'm not even 30 yet! This is some insane conspiracy by a bunch of 23-year-old marketing interns to make me older than my years. Those damned whippersnappers.
Posted by: Stephanie at April 14, 2004 07:39 AM