|
|
|
|
|
With all the (mostly) positive words being written about John Edwards and what he brings to the formerly lackluster Democratic ticket, I'm beginning to wonder if our chances of taking back the White House would be better with Edwards-Kerry than the converse?
Just a thought.
Posted by ayelet at July 11, 2004 01:12 PMI don't think Edwards-Kerry would be better. After all, Edwards had his chance in the primaries and caucuses. He fared better than people first assumed, but Kerry was the one with the big numbers, and for good reason-- Kerry conveys more authority than Edwards.
Edwards could turn out to be the left-wing Dan Quayle, if he's not careful.
Posted by: James at July 12, 2004 11:26 AM