October 14, 2004

I Want to Like Him... Is That Enough?

First, more fuel for the fire: U.S. Deficit Hits Record $413 Billion. Sickening.

After sitting through last night's snoozefest (aka presidential debate #3), I was roused from indifference only a handful of times, reacting in one of two ways: a) disbelief resulting in weak chuckling, eye-rolling and/or head-shaking, or b) utter disgust with the whole debacle already. I mean, has not a single stinking question been answered truthfully or fully throughout this ridiculous, three-act Mr. Congeniality pageant?

One thing that struck me like a speeding train was that I do not particularly like John Kerry. Yes, I will vote for him. I will vote for him because I generally concur with his ideas and values and I believe a new administration will reinvigorate this disheartened country. I am saddled with an all-consuming eagerness to wave a blaring "Buh-bye" to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of an administration that has not been healthy for the American people.

But last night I came to terms with a feeling that's been gnawing at me since the primaries: John Kerry is not likable. We know he's intelligent, well-spoken, educated, experienced and honorable. But where's the charisma, the warmth, the personality? I will vote for John Kerry, but what I want so badly is to connect with this man on a level other than "Well, he'd make a far better leader than Bush," yet I have not determined how to do that.

Sadly, that seems to be a common lament amongst my fellow voters in the "Anyone but Bush" camp, those of us losing sleep with concern over voters who -- while aware enough to know Bush and company spell more bad news for the world -- just don't feel that vital connection with Kerry. The desperate question posed is whether or not Kerry's lack of likability could cause even a fraction of otherwise Democratic voters to vote for Bush (or not at all).

Bill Clinton radiated warmth and wit to Americans and they, in turn, opened their hearts to his charm, intelligence and charisma. Even Howard Dean had more passion, personality and persistence than Kerry. Despite his coming across as a raving lunatic during the primaries, he would have eventually lived that down and may have been the man to unite this country in getting truly excited about a candidate as opposed to merely getting behind the guy who's not Bush.

I still support Kerry and encourage others to vote for him, because I believe without a shred of doubt that Bush needs and deserves to be removed. And, as I attempt to find reasons to warm up to Kerry, I am optimistic when considering the fact that it's not just Kerry who will be hanging his suits and ties in the closet of the Oval Office. He'll bring with him an entire new team of sharp minds to fill all those stuffy posts now occupied by misguided people whose only mission is to get their incompetent boss re-elected despite his countless missteps. That in itself will be an improvement of monumental proportions.

Posted by ayelet at October 14, 2004 02:50 PM
Comments

Good point, and definitely something I have thought about myself. Last night I watched the latest episode of Real Time With Bill Maher; Howard Dean was his opening interview. What a charismatic guy.. but the bigger point came later (and Dean was in FULL support of Kerry and quite vocal against Bush). Alanis Morissette was on the panel (along with Jesse Jackson, it was a great time). Maher made similar comment about Kerry trying to crack a joke or "zinger" with his Soprano comment, and it made him groan that for 4 years we're just going to be cracking UP with this president. Alanis said, "We don't need a president who is going to crack us up, we need someone who will do the job." I agree, lesser of the two evils, but SO much lesser!

Posted by: Aviva at October 17, 2004 07:43 PM

Doesn't it say something about how screwed up our priorities have become that you can't get as fired up as you'd like to about Kerry despite the fact that you "concur with his ideas and values"? I think this is only one step away from the Bush supporters who support their candidate because they feel more comfortable with a guy who is kinda stupid, like them. It feels like reality tv has turned everythng into a popularity contest. It's not about who would be a more fun date.
I have the same feelings: Clinton was so charming, Dean was so exciting. But I think we should work to eliminate likability from the list of qualities we look for in a president.

Posted by: ruby at October 17, 2004 07:26 PM

I think Howard Dean got hornswaggled by the Kerry camp-- what did they do behind the scenes to pull off that coup in the first caucus? They did what Bush did to McCain in 2000-- copued everything they could from the front-runner and then tripped him up. Kerry, I'm sure, manuevered some sneaky shit behind Dean to get the jump on him in the primaries.

And the media was so shirll concerning that infamous Dean scream. Suddenly, it became about "electability". And on that, I must agree-- Kerry is electable. Obviously Bush isn't going to win by a landslide if he does win, so Kerry hasa good chance.

In a perfect world, Dean would be up there. But then again, in a perfect world, Gore would be President right now.

Posted by: James at October 15, 2004 02:46 AM